Informal AI use
Scattered tools, invisible decisions and lost evidence.
If AI is already in the team, we bring order to its use. If it is not yet there, we define where to start.
Use cases, controls, evidence and next steps to move forward without improvising.
Many teams already use AI in development, review, documentation, support or automation. Risk appears when usage moves faster than rules, evidence, review and accountability.
Scattered tools, invisible decisions and lost evidence.
Paid tools that do not change tickets, PRs, tests or releases.
Interesting experiments without owner, metrics or exit criteria.
More code and suggestions, but not more real evaluation capacity.
Text that looks correct, but has no source, decision or verifiable change.
Automation without permissions, rollback, gates or assigned accountability.
Risks, observable facts and initial scope.
Permissions, roles, data, gates and evidence.
Real flows with human review.
Quality, effort, risk and acceptance.
Stop, repeat, redesign or scale.
Every intervention turns AI use into a clear operating base: prioritised use cases, defined controls, evidence, review criteria, responsibilities and next steps that engineering, product, security, leadership and compliance can use.
Where AI is used, who uses it, which risks it creates and what evidence exists.
Minimum controls for prompts, code, documentation, testing, PRs and release.
A real flow put into practice with roles, permissions, review and metrics.
Recommended decisions: scale, limit, redesign or stop.
For organisations already using AI in scattered ways and for those still deciding where to start.
We identify real use cases, risks, permissions, workflows, evidence and human review to pilot, govern or scale with judgement.